Rethinking human-tech skill complementarity  

“A dynamic, multi-level synergy between human skills and technology capabilities, in which both reinforce and support each other across task, role, team, and organisational contexts, enhancing task performance and organisational efficiency.
This complementarity depends not only on the functional attributes of the technology and the alignment of human skills but also on environmental factors, organisational support, and user behaviours related to active/passive technology usage.”

Bridging the gap: rethinking skills in the age of human-tech collaboration

As digital transformation accelerates, the conversation around the future of work is no longer about whether machines will replace humans, but how they can work together. The TechConnect project is addressing this shift head-on with a groundbreaking conceptual framework: Human-Tech Skill Complementarity.  

ESCOX: the new skills extractor tool

In today’s fast-changing job market, staying aligned with the right skills is more important than ever. Yet identifying what skills are in demand, and how they connect to actual jobs, is still a challenge. Traditional keyword searches often fail to capture the complexity of job descriptions or match them to recognised taxonomies like ESCO (European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations). 

UMC Utrecht’s approach to safer, faster, and more precise healthcare

How can hospitals make everyday care safer, faster and more precise? Utrecht University and UMC Utrecht are driving innovation in hospital settings by developing smart, practical solutions to support healthcare professionals and improve patients’ safety: from robotic surgery to medical device management.

Rethinking Human-Tech Collaboration

The Human-Tech Skill Complementarity Conceptual Framework (D1.1) is a vital step towards understanding the critical interplay between human skills and emerging digital technologies, focusing on the ‘affordance gap’—the disconnect between how new technologies are intended to be used versus how they are used in practice.